February 9, 2008

Time Limits for Filing Sexual Abuse Claims in UK

This article is a fascinating (at least to lawyers who represent survivors of sexual abuse) review of the development of the law in the U.K. regarding time limits for filing civil claims for compensation for sexual abuse.

Until recently, I would have said that Canada, and Nova Scotia in particular, had the most liberal time limits for filing civil claims for historical sexual abuse. Based on this article I believe that the U.K. may now have taken the lead in protecting the rights of survivors of childhood sexual absue.

February 7, 2008

Colorado Considers Eliminating Time Limits for Sex Abuse Claims

A state legislator wants to eliminate the statute of limitations for sexual abuse lawsuits.

Rep. Gwyn Green (D-Golden) is sponsoring the "Children's Protection Bill." Based on the proposed law, a victim of sexual abuse would be able to sue an organization or an agency if it knew about the abuse and failed to take reasonable steps to prevent the perpetrator from committing the abuse.

In the landmark ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada in M.K. v. M.H. the court ruled that the time limit in historical sexual abuse claims did not start to run until the victim was reasonably capable of discovering the wrongful nature of the abuser's acts and the nexus between those acts and the victim's injuries.

The ruling in M.K. v. M.H. has since been codified in the limitation statutes of all Canadian provinces and territories and is generally refered to as the "discoverability rule".

The proposed Colorado statute seems to go even further than the Canadian discoverability rule. There is no indication that when the victim discovered the effects of the abuse has any bearing on the time limit to bring a claim.

If this is the case, then the statute would be one of the most liberal victim protection laws in North America.

February 1, 2008

"Floodgate" of Sexual Abuse Claims to Open in U.K.

The House of Lords decision extending time limits for filing sexual abuse claims that I posted about yesterday is likely to open the "floodgates" to hundreds of historical sexual abuse claims, according to an article today in the Evening Gazette.

The story reports that:

A landmark legal ruling has opened the floodgates to one of the biggest claims of alleged sexual abuse in history.

The Catholic Diocese of Middlesbrough is set to be sued by 140 men over alleged physical and sexual abuse suffered while in care.

The House of Lords decision gives broad discretion to judges to allow historical claims for sexual abuse, even when time limits for filing the claims have passed.

The ruling appears to go even further than the historic decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in M.K. v. M.H. which ruled that historical sexual abuse claims, although subject to limitations legislation, did not accrue until the plaintiff was reasonably capable of discovering the wrongful nature of the defendant's acts and the nexus between those acts and the plaintiff's injuries.

The Court clarified that the "reasonable discoverability rule" means that in cases of historical sexual abuse, the limitations period should begin to run only when the plaintiff has a substantial awareness of the harm and its likely cause.

The House of Lords decision means that the courts in the U.K. have gone even further than the courts in Canada and the United States to protect the rights of victims of childhood sexual abuse.

January 31, 2008

Time Limit for Filing Sexual Abuse Claims Extended by House of Lords

In an interesting decision released this week in the U.K. the House of Lords extended the time limit for filing a claim for compensation for sexual abuse.

In the U.K. the general rule is that the period of limitation for an action in tort is six years from the date on which the cause of action accrues. Claims for “damages for negligence, nuisance or breach of duty", causing personal injuries have a limitation period of three years from either the date when the cause of action accrued or the “date of knowledge” (similar to the Canada's "discoverability" rule).

The decision appears to grant broad discretion to judges in the U.K. to extend time limits for filing claims for compensation for sexual abuse.

Personally, my view is that there should be no time limit for filing claims for compensation for sexual abuse. In my experience representing survivors of childhood sexual abuse I have found that many (if not most) survivors do not disclose their experiences until later in life. Usually after the survivor has gone through years of counselling or therapy.

In Nova Scotia, this reality is recognized by Section 2(5) of our Limitation of Actions Act which says:

(5) In any action for assault, menace, battery or wounding based on sexual abuse of a person,

(a) ... the cause of action does not arise until the person becomes aware of the injury or harm resulting from the sexual abuse and discovers the causal relationship between the injury or harm and the sexual abuse; and

(b) notwithstanding subsection (1), the limitation period ...does not begin to run while that person is not reasonably capable of commencing a proceeding because of that person's physical, mental or psychological condition resulting from the sexual abuse.