<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Sexual Abuse Claims Blog</title>
      <link>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/</link>
      <description>Published by Arnold | Pizzo | McKiggan</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:17:02 -0400</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.33</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Sins of the Fathers: Sexual Abuse in the Archdiocese of Dublin </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The sexual abuse scandal in catholic schools in Ireland has documented a “substantial level of sexual abuse” in Catholic run schools in Ireland. </p>

<p>Now, TV3 has produced a documentary called <strong>“<a href="http://www.tv3.ie/shows.php?request=abuseoftrust&tv3_preview=&video=10258">Abuse of Trust: Sins of the Fathers</a>” </strong>which documents some of the horror stories of sexual abuse by priests who were part of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Dublin. </p>

<p>The documentary uncovers a pattern that has been repeated time and time again in countries around the world. Roman Catholic Priests sexually abusing children and persons of authority within the church covering up the allegations and moving sexually predatory priests from parish to parish. </p>

<p>I represent Ron Martin who has filed a proposed class action against the Roman Catholic Diocese of Antigonish on behalf of victims who were sexually abused by priests who were employed by the Diocese of Antigonish. If you or a family member were victimized by a priest who was part of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Antigonish you can contact me through this blog, or by calling toll free 1-877-423-2050, for more information.   <br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2009/06/sins_of_the_fathers_sexual_abu.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2009/06/sins_of_the_fathers_sexual_abu.html</guid>
         <category>Child Abuse</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:17:02 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Catholic Church Covered Up Child Sexual Abuse in Irish Schools: What else is new?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>After ten years of investigations a <a href="http://www.childabusecommission.ie/index.html">government inquiry </a>into sexual abuse in Catholic run schools, orphanages and hospitals has released an exhaustive and <a href="http://www.childabusecommission.com/rpt/ExecSummary.php">damning report</a>.</p>

<p><strong>Abuse Endemic</strong><br />
The inquiry commission uncovered:<br />
<blockquote>...a substantial level of sexual abuse of boys in care that extended over a range from improper touching and fondling to rape with violence.</blockquote></p>

<p>Corporal punishment in girls’ schools was:<blockquote>pervasive, severe, arbitrary and unpredictable. </blockquote></p>

<p><strong>Church Knew About Dangers</strong></p>

<p>The Commission determind that: <blockquote>The recidivist nature of sexual abuse was known to religious authorities.</blockquote></p>

<p><strong>Church Concerned About Reputation, Not Risk to Children</strong></p>

<p>Time and time again we have seen how the Catholic Church values it's reputation more that the lives of the children under it's care. The same pattern repeated itself in Ireland: <blockquote>The risk was seen by the congregations in terms of potential for scandal and bad publicity should the abuse be disclosed. The danger to children was not taken into account.</blockquote><strong><br />
Silence Protects the Abusers</strong></p>

<p>If you have been a victim of sexual abuse by a priest, or any person in authority, please, please please tell someone. Silence only protects the abusers and the institutions that harbour them.</p>

<p>I have represented hundreds of victims of childhood sexual abuse in claims for compensation. As a public service I have prepared a resource guide for survivors of sexual abuse in Atlantic Canada. The guide contains a list of support groups throughout the Maritimes for survivors of sexual abuse.</p>

<p>You can receive a free copy of <strong><em>The Survivor's Guide to Abuse Compensation Claims </em></strong>by <a href="http://www.apmlawyers.com/lawyer-attorney-1259817.html">contacting me </a>through this blog, or my website at www.apmlawyers.com or by calling toll free in Atlantic Canada <strong>1-877-423-2050. </strong><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2009/05/catholic_church_covered_up_chi.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2009/05/catholic_church_covered_up_chi.html</guid>
         <category>Child Abuse</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 22:43:18 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Victim of Priest Sexual Abuse Receives 1.75 Million Dollar Settlement</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The Roman Catholic Diocese of London, Ontario has agreed to pay Lou-Anne Soontiens $1,745,000.00, plus legal costs to compensate her for years of sexual abuse she suffered as a child at the hands of Father Charles Sylvestre. The total value of the settlement is thought to be more than 2.2 million dollars.  </p>

<p>Sylvestre, one of Canada’s most notorious pedophiles was convicted of sexually assaulting Sootiens. </p>

<p>CBC's Fifth Estate aired a documentary about Sylvestre called <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/goodfather/multimedia.html">"The Good Father". </a>As you will see from watching the documentary it is apparent that persons of authority within the Catholic Church knew about Sylvestre’s sexual abuse but did nothing to protect his victims.</p>

<p>I have posted about Sylvestre's predatory abuse <a href="http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2007/07/church_knew_about_canadas_wors.html">in the past</a>.  See also, <strong><a href="http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2008/02/sex_abuse_help_fund_doubled.html">Sex Abuse help Fund Doubled</a>.</strong></p>

<p>The effects of childhood sexual abuse can be devasting. Although the scars my not be visible, the damage caused to the victims can be totally disabling. Because of the psychological effects of their abuse, many victims are not able to bring forward their claims on their own behalf.</p>

<p>My client Ron Martin has filed a class action against the Roman Catholic Diocese of Antigonish on behalf of persons that suffered sexual abuse by priests that who were members of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Antigonish. </p>

<p>If you or a family member were a victim of sexual abuse by a priest from the Roman Catholic Diocese of Antigonish you can <a href="http://www.apmlawyers.com/lawyer-attorney-1259817.html">contact me</a>, or take a look at <a href="http://www.apmlawyers.com/lawyer-attorney-1293334.html">my website </a>for more information about the class action. <br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2009/05/victim_of_priest_sexual_abuse_receives_175_million_dollar_settlement.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2009/05/victim_of_priest_sexual_abuse_receives_175_million_dollar_settlement.html</guid>
         <category>Child Abuse</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:31:11 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Nova Scotia Sexual Abuse Claims Barred by Statute: Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims can Proceed</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>In two related decisions released last month, Justice Walter Goodfellow has ruled that the plaintiffs' claims for compensation for assault and negligence as a result of childhood sexual abuse were statute barred. However, Goodfellow J. allowed the plaintiffs' claims for compensation for breach of fiduciary duty to continue. </p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.courts.ns.ca/decisions_recent/documents/2009nssc132_001.pdf">Robert Lawrence Borden </a></strong>and <strong><a href="http://www.courts.ns.ca/decisions_recent/documents/2009nssc137.pdf">Leonard Anthony Smith </a></strong>were both former residents of the <strong>Nova Scotia Home for Colored Children</strong>. </p>

<p>Borden and Smith have filed a proposed class action on behalf of all former residents of the school seeking compensation for assault and negligence as a result of sexual abuse they allege happened while they were residents were living in the Home for Colored Children.</p>

<p>With respect to Borden’s claim, Justice Goodfellow determined that the "undisputed" facts were that Borden knew what had happened to him was wrong and had provided full disclosure to friends (and strangers) about what had happened to him at the home many years before he filed his lawsuit. </p>

<p>Similarly, Justice Goodfellow determined that the undisputed facts were that Smith was also aware that what had happened to him in the home was wrong and that there was a causal connection with his experiences in the home and the harm that he had suffered. He had clear memories of the abuse which he disclosed to his wife and to an author who was writing a book about the Home. He also disclosed his experiences to a potential employer when applying for jobs as a youth counselor. </p>

<p>Justice Goodfellow determined that the claims for assault and negligence were statute barred under Nova Scotia's <strong><a href="http://www.gov.ns.ca/legislature/legc/statutes/limitatn.htm">Limitation of Actions Act</a></strong>.</p>

<p>However, Justice Goodfellow confirmed that, in accordance with the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal’s decision in <a href="http://www.canlii.org/en/ns/nsca/doc/2007/2007nsca52/2007nsca52.pdf">Milbury v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General)</a> (another claim arising from the Home for Colored Children) there is no limitation period (at least in Nova Scotia) for a claim for breach of fiduciary duty. </p>

<p>Therefore, all of the claimants’ claims based on assault and negligence were struck as being statute barred. However, the claimants’ claims based on breach of fiduciary duty were allowed to proceed. </p>

<p>Childhood sexual abuse can cause lasting and disabling psychological injuries. However, these decisions point out the difficulty that survivors of childhood abuse may have when seeking access to justice through the courts. The decisions confirm that survivors of childhood sexual abuse should consult with legal counsel as soon as possible when they become aware of the connection between their childhood abuse and the disabling effects of the abuse later in life. <br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2009/05/nova_scotia_sexual_abuse_claim.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2009/05/nova_scotia_sexual_abuse_claim.html</guid>
         <category>Child Abuse</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 15:57:08 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Pope Apologizes (Sort of) for Abuse at Indian Residential Schools</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Residential School Survivors Meet Pope</strong></p>

<p>A group of Survivors from Canada’s Indian Residential Schools had a private audience with Pope Benedict. The delegation was led by assembly of First Nations Chief Phil Fontaine. The group also includes one of the survivors of the Shubenacadie Indian Residential School, Membertou Chief Terry Paul. </p>

<p><strong>Pope Apologizes to Abuse Survivors</strong></p>

<p>The Survivors received a personal apology from the Pope on behalf of the Roman Catholic Church for <a href="http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20090429/pope_residentialschools_090429/20090429?hub=TopStories">its "deplorable" role</a> in Canada’s Indian Residential School system.</p>

<p><strong>Late update: It appears that media reports of the Pope's apology (like Mark Twain's death) have been greatly exaggerated. Reports now indicate that the Pope did not apologize or acknowlege the Catholic Churches role in the abuse suffered by children in the residential schools. rather he expressed "sorrow" for the suffering of the children.</strong></p>

<p><strong>Students Suffered Physical and Sexual Abuse </strong></p>

<p>There were about 130 Indian Residential Schools across Canada and 75% of the schools were run by the Catholic Church. Students at the schools were taken from their families and placed in the schools where many of them suffered horrible physical abuse, sexual abuse and loss of their language and culture. </p>

<p><strong>Previous Apologies</strong></p>

<p>Until today, the Catholic Church had never apologized for the horrible abuse at Church run schools. Other religious organizations that ran schools have long since issued apologies, including the Anglican Church in 1993, the Presbyterian Church in 1994 and the United Church of Canada in 1998. Prime Minister Stephen Harper also offered an apology on behalf of the Government of Canada in June of last year. </p>

<p><strong>Nora Bernard Filed First Class Action</strong></p>

<p>The greatest honour I have ever had as a lawyer was representing <a href="http://www.apmlawyers.com/lawyer-attorney-1306422.html">Nora Bernard </a>and the other Survivors of the Shubenacadie Indian Residential School in their <a href="http://www.apmlawyers.com/lawyer-attorney-1280552.html">fight for compensation </a>for what happened to them as a result of the Residential School system. </p>

<p>Nora filed the first class action against the Government of Canada and the Catholic Church seeking compensation for loss of language and culture for Residential School Survivors. Nora’s claim played an <a href="http://www.apmlawyers.com/lawyer-attorney-1306434.html">important role </a>in the five billion dollar Indian Residential School Class Action Settlement, the largest historical redress settlement in the world.</p>

<p>I am sure Nora was watching today. I think I can sum up what her reaction would be in three words: <strong>"It's about time!"   </strong></p>

<p>Wela'lieg</p>

<p><strong>Update:</strong></p>

<p>I have been reading further media reports of this mornings meeting. Apparently earlier reports that the Pope apologized are incorrect. Instead the Pope expressed "sorrow" for the "deplorable" treatment of aboriginal children in catholic run residential schools. </p>

<p>But the Pope did not go so far as to apologize or admit that the Catholic Church had any responsibility for the physical and sexual abuse suffered by children in the schools.</p>

<p>The Canadian government and every single religious organization that ran the residential schools (except the catholic Church) have acknowledged their personal responsibility and apologized for the horrible abuse that took place in the Residential schools.</p>

<p>How can the Catholic Church ever hope to receive forgiveness from residential school survivors if it won't take responsibility for it's actions?</p>

<p>What do you think? </p>

<p><a href="http://technorati.com/claim/5daxywf554" rel="me">Technorati Profile</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2009/04/pope_apologizes_sort_of_for_ab.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2009/04/pope_apologizes_sort_of_for_ab.html</guid>
         <category>Clergy Abuse</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:00:46 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Court Date Set For Sexual Abuse Class Action Against Antigonish Diocese</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>There have been new developments in the class action filed against the Roman Catholic Diocese of Antigonish. The class action was filed by Ron Martin on behalf of all persons who were sexually abused by priests who were members of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Antigonish. </p>

<p><strong>Case Management Judge Assigned</strong></p>

<p>Justice John Murphy has been assigned to case manage the class action lawsuit. Justice Murphy will be in charge of ensuring that the class action moves forward in an orderly fashion.</p>

<p><strong>Court Date Set</strong></p>

<p>The Certification hearing for the Antigonish Diocese Class Action has been scheduled to take place in Halifax, <strong>August 4, 5 and 6, 2009</strong>. </p>

<p>The certification hearing is basically a "mini-trial" where the court determines whether there is sufficient evidence to allow Ron Martin and the other people who alleged that they were sexually abused by priests from the Antigonish Diocese to proceed with their claim <em>as a group </em>. If the certification motion fails, then each sexual abuse survivor will be forced to file individual lawsuits if they want to make a claim for compensation.</p>

<p><strong>Who Can Join the Class Action?</strong></p>

<p>If you were a victim of sexual abuse by a priest that was a member of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Antigonish, you are entitled to participate in the class action. We have prepared an information package about the class action lawsuit that we will provide, free of charge. If you would like to receive a copy of the information package, please contact my office by calling toll free <strong>1 (877) 423 2050 </strong>or by contacting me through this blog.</p>

<p><strong>More Information</strong></p>

<p>For more background information about the class action lawsuit you can read some of the <strong><a href="http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2008/06/media_reports_of_antigonish_di_1.html">Media Reports about the Antigonish Diocese Sexual Abuse Class Action</a></strong>.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2008/08/antigonish_diocese_priest_sexual_abuse_class_action.html">Antigonish Diocese Priest Sexual Abuse Class Action</a></strong> </p>

<p><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2009/04/court_date_set_for_sexual_abuse_class_action_against_antigonish_diocese.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2009/04/court_date_set_for_sexual_abuse_class_action_against_antigonish_diocese.html</guid>
         <category>Clergy Abuse</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:40:54 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Child Abuse can Permanently Alter Your Genes </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Childhood abuse can permanently change the way your genes fight stress, leaving victims of childhood abuse more vulnerable to stressful events throughout their life. </p>

<p><strong>Abuse Alters Gene Function</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/02/090223-abused-children-genes.html">Researchers at Montreal’s McGill University </a>have published a study which suggests that childhood abuse can have, not only long term psychological effects, but can physically alter the way abuse victim’s genes function. </p>

<p>The study, published in the journal <em><strong><a href="http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v12/n3/abs/nn.2270.html">Nature Neuroscience</a></strong></em> found that childhood abuse alters hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (<strong>HPA</strong>) function, increasing the risk of suicide in survivors of childhood abuse. </p>

<p>Researchers compared the brains of suicide victims who had a history of childhood abuse with those who died from suicide (but no history of childhood abuse) and persons who died from natural death.</p>

<p><strong>Abuse Inhibits Production of Anti-Stress Hormones</strong></p>

<p>The study found that the abuse victims underlying DNA was not changed. However, the <strong>HPA</strong> genes effect was decreased, causing the brain to produce fewer calming hormones which made it more difficult for abuse victims to deal with subsequent stressful events. </p>

<p>Sexual abuse lawyers, and persons who work with survivors of childhood abuse have known for decades that child abuse is one of the highest risk factors for different types of psychiatric disorders. </p>

<p>However, this research appears to be one of the first indicators that childhood abuse can actually cause physical changes to the body which can have an impact on the survivor’s life which spans decades.</p>

<p>It is still early, but perhaps this research may lead to a cure for some of the lasting effects of childhood abuse. </p>

<p>Watch <a href="http://watch.ctv.ca/news/clip142853#clip142853">an interview with Patrick McGowan, head of McGill's research team. </a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2009/02/child_abuse_can_permanently_alter_your_genes_.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2009/02/child_abuse_can_permanently_alter_your_genes_.html</guid>
         <category>Child Abuse</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:38:47 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Catholic Church Liable for Sexual Abuse of Altar Boys: St. John’s, Newfoundland</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Last week the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador ruled that the Roman Catholic Church in St. John’s was responsible for the sexual abuse of eight former altar boys by disgraced priest, Reverend James Hickey. </p>

<p><strong>Priest Convicted of Abusing Alter Boys</strong></p>

<p>Hickey was criminally charged ten years ago with sexually abusing the boys while he was a parish priest on the Burin Peninsula. He was convicted and spent five years in prison. </p>

<p><strong>Church Fights Victims for 10 Years</strong></p>

<p>Despite Hickey’s criminal conviction the Roman Catholic Church has fought the victim’s claims for compensation tooth and nail for almost <strong>10 years</strong>. </p>

<p><strong>Destroyed Faith in God</strong></p>

<p>Gregory Stack, who represented the abuse survivors, told <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2009/02/10/church-liable.html">CBC News </a> that the sexual abuse didn’t just destroy the victims physically or psychologically, the sexual abuse destroyed their faith in God. </p>

<blockquote>“The boys…generally came from the more devout catholic homes. The more devout, the more religious parents that pushed their children to become altar boys, and these were the boys who were victimized by the parish priest. 

<p>It is the whole coupling of that- the sense that god has abused them. And that’s what they believed in those small communities. By in large, the parish priest was a god-like figure”</blockquote></p>

<p>This is just another sad example of how the Catholic Church is prepared to fight to it's last penny rather than acknowledge it's responsibility to the victims of sexual abuse by Catholic priests. </p>

<p><strong>Supreme Court Rules Church Responsible for Sexual Abuse</strong></p>

<p>Six years ago the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the Roman Catholic Church is responsible (vicariously liable) for sexual abuse by it's Priests. In <strong><a href="http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2004/2004scc17/2004scc17.html">Doe v. Bennett </a></strong>(another priest abuse case from Newfoundland) the court ruled that the Roman Catholic Church was responsible for the sexual abuse perpetrated by it's priests because of the power and authority over parishioners that the Church gave to it's priests.</p>

<p>The Supreme Court of Canada stated that:</p>

<blockquote>“The relationship between the bishop and the priest in the Diocese is not only spiritual but temporal. 

<p>First, the Bishop provided Bennett with the opportunity to abuse his power.</p>

<p>Second, Bennett’s wrongful acts were strongly related to the psychological intimacy inherent in his role as priest.</p>

<p>Third, the Bishop conferred an enormous degree of power on Bennett relative to his victims”  </blockquote> </p>

<p>The Catholic Church’s refusal to acknowledge its responsibility to Hickey’s victims simply perpetuates the view that the Catholic Church cares more about its reputation than it does about protecting vulnerable and innocent children from sexual abuse.</p>

<p><strong>Related Posts:</strong></p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2007/09/do_myths_about_child_abuse_exp.html">Do Myths About Child Abuse Explain The Church Sex Abuse Scandals?</</a></p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2007/07/sexual_abuse_not_just_a_cathol.html">Sexual Abuse: Not Just a Catholic Problem?</a> </strong></p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2007/07/does_the_catholic_church_attra.html">Does the Catholic Church Attract Sexual Abusers…or Create Them?</a> </strong></p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2008/10/supreme_court_of_canada_clarifies_burden_of_proof_for_sexual_abuse_victims.html">Supreme Court of Canada Clarifies Burden of Proof for Sexual Abuse Victims</a></strong></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2009/02/catholic_church_liable_for_sexual_abuse_of_alter_boys_st_johns_newfoundland.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2009/02/catholic_church_liable_for_sexual_abuse_of_alter_boys_st_johns_newfoundland.html</guid>
         <category>Child Abuse</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:16:54 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Nora Bernard Honoured for Work on Behalf of Residential School Abuse Survivors: C.T.V. Documentary </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>C.T.V.’s Native Affairs program <strong><em>First Story </em></strong>has aired a documentary on the life of <strong>Nora Bernard</strong>. </p>

<p>I was pleased to have participated in the documentary honouring my friend and client, Nora Bernard. </p>

<p>First Story takes a retrospective look at Nora’s fight for compensation for survivors against the Government of Canada and the Catholic Church on behalf of former residential school students across Canada and the legacy she left for Residential School Survivors across Canada.</p>

<p>You can watch the documentary <a href="http://www.ctvbc.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20081216/bc_firststory_nov29_joseph_nora_081216/20081216/?hub=BritishColumbiaSpecialEvent3">by clicking here </a>(Nora’s documentary is found in part 3 and part 4 of the program).</p>

<p>For <a href="http://www.apmlawyers.com/lawyer-attorney-1306422.html">more information about Nora Bernard</a>, and the class action settlement on behalf of Indian Residential School students, you can <a href="http://www.apmlawyers.com/lawyer-attorney-1280552.html">check out my firm's website</a>. <br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2009/01/nora_bernard_honoured_for_work_on_behalf_of_residential_school_abuse_survivors_ctv_documentary_.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2009/01/nora_bernard_honoured_for_work_on_behalf_of_residential_school_abuse_survivors_ctv_documentary_.html</guid>
         <category>Residential School Claims</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:43:20 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Vatican Can Be Sued For Priest Sexual Abuse: U.S. Court of Appeals</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>In a landmark ruling, the Court of Appeals in Cincinnati has allowed a lawsuit over alleged sexual abuse by Catholic priests to proceed against the Vatican. </p>

<p>The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122756420187954231.html">Wall Street Journal </a>has reported that lawyers for the Vatican tried to strike out the plaintiffs’ lawsuits under the <strong>Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act</strong>, a U.S. federal law that governs when a foreign Country can be sued. The U.S. law contains a number of restrictions that limit the ability to sue a foreign state.</p>

<p>The Cincinnati Court of Appeals confirmed that the Vatican is a foreign state, and therefore <em>eligible</em> for sovereign immunity. However, the court determined that the plaintiffs were able to continue their lawsuit under an <em>exception</em> to the <strong>Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act </strong>which allows lawsuits for damages caused by “tortious acts” of a foreign State. </p>

<p>The plaintiffs’ law suit claims that U.S. bishops are employees of the Vatican and that the Vatican and bishops have engaged in a coordinated policy of covering up acts of sexual abuse by priests.</p>

<p>You can <a href="http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/08a0417p-06.pdf">read the Court of Appeal’s decision here</a>. </p>

<p>Here is Canada, the relevant legislation is the <strong><a href="http://www.canlii.org/ca/sta/s-18/">State Immunity Act</a></strong>.  The restrictions under Canada's legislation are not as onerous as the U.S. legislation and the Canadian legislation clearly permits claims for personal injury:</p>

<blockquote>6. A foreign state is not immune from the jurisdiction of a court in any proceedings that relate to

<p>(a) any death or personal or bodily injury, or</p>

<p>(b) any damage to or loss of property</p>

<p>that occurs in Canada.</blockquote></p>

<p><br />
Here in Nova Scotia, <a href="http://www.apmlawyers.com/lawyer-attorney-1315903.html">Ronald Martin has filed a class action lawsuit </a>against the bishops of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Antigonish for sexual abuse perpetrated by various priests who were employed by the Antigonish Diocese between 1950 and 1980.  </p>

<p>Related posts:</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2008/06/documentary_explores_vatican_s_1.html">Documentary Explores Vatican Sexual Abuse Cover Up</a></strong></p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2008/05/lawyer_wants_to_question_pope_abour_sex_abuse_cover_ups.html">Lawyer wants to Question Pope about Sex Abuse Cover Ups</a></strong></p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2007/05/lawsuit_against_vatican_can_pr.html">Lawsuit against Vatican can proceed</a> </strong></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2008/11/vatican_can_be_sued_for_priest_sexual_abuse_us_court_of_appeals.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2008/11/vatican_can_be_sued_for_priest_sexual_abuse_us_court_of_appeals.html</guid>
         <category>Clergy Abuse</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:04:48 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Vatican Issues Guidelines for Psychological Screening of Priests: What took so long? </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The Vatican has issued guidelines for psychological screening of new priests. <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hejaPlCMqsPz8TbjNFpsY9Y5eoVQD94530MO0">The Associated Press has reported </a>that the guidelines were issued in response to sexual abuse scandals that have cost the Roman Catholic Church hundreds of millions of dollars in settlements for victims of sexual abuse.</p>

<p><strong>Weeding Out Psychopaths</strong></p>

<p>According to AP, the guidelines are supposed to help church leaders weed out candidates with "psychopathic disturbances." </p>

<p><strong>Scapegoating Homosexuals?</strong></p>

<p>The BBC has reported that the voluntary tests should also aim to vet for those with "deep-seated homosexual tendencies". Of course being homosexual has nothing to do with whether someone is more likely to commit sexual abuse. Needless to say, Gay rights groups have denounced the guidelines as unfairly targeting homosexuals.</p>

<p><strong>Is It Enough?</strong></p>

<p>SNAP (The Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests) has responded by claiming that the screening guidelines do not go far enough. SNAP has called for an end to what SNAP calls the church's "virtually unchanged culture of secrecy and unchecked power in the hierarchy" that left dangerous priests in parishes.</p>

<p><strong>Is the Catholic Church the Problem?</strong></p>

<p>I have posted before about research that suggests that the way in which the Catholic Church educates/trains it's priests <a href="http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2007/07/does_the_catholic_church_attra.html">may actually<em> create</em> sexual abusers</a>.</p>

<p><strong>Only the First Step</strong></p>

<p>Screening out people who may be potential sexual abusers is a good first step. But the screening, which is now voluntary, needs to be mandatory.</p>

<p>But the bigger problem, one that the Church has so far failed to address, is the culture of secrecy that still permeates the Church. There are persons in authority throughout the catholic Church that will do anything to protect the reputation of the Church. Even at the expense of innocent victims of sexual abuse.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2008/10/vatican_issues_guidelines_for_psychological_screening_of_priests_what_took_so_long_.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2008/10/vatican_issues_guidelines_for_psychological_screening_of_priests_what_took_so_long_.html</guid>
         <category>Clergy Abuse</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:47 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Supreme Court of Canada Clarifies Burden of Proof for Sexual Abuse Victims</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday the Supreme Court of Canada restored a finding of civil liability for sexual assaults committed by an Oblate Brother against a former Indian Residential School Student decades ago and confirmed the burden of proof that victims of historical sexual assaults must meet if they pursue civil claim for compensation.</p>

<p>In <strong><a href="http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2008/2008scc53/2008scc53.html">F.H. v. McDougall </a></strong>the Supreme Court of Canada upheld a finding of civil liability against Ian Hugh McDougall, a former teacher at the Meares Island Indian Residential school. McDougall was originally found liable in B.C. Supreme Court, but the judgment was overturned by the B.C. Court of Appeal.</p>

<p>The B.C. Court of Appeal ruled that the testimony of adult victims about sexual assaults that happened during childhood require independent corroboration.</p>

<blockquote>“[t]o choose one over the other . . . requires . . . an articulated reason founded in evidence <strong>other than that of the plaintiff</strong>” </blockquote>

<p>The judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada was delivered by Rothstein J. He considered whether there was a shifting burden of proof in Canada or if allegations of criminal misconduct should carry a higher burden of proof similar to the burden in criminal prosecutions.</p>

<p>Justice Rothstein emphatically laid the debate to rest:</p>

<blockquote>"...I would reaffirm that in civil cases there is only one standard of proof and that is proof on a balance of probabilities.  In all civil cases, the trial judge must scrutinize the relevant evidence with care to determine whether it is more likely than not that an alleged event occurred."</blockquote>

<p>With respect to the supposed requirement for corroborating witnesses, Rothstein J. said:</p>

<blockquote>"Corroborative evidence is always helpful and does strengthen the evidence of the party relying on it as I believe Rowles J.A. was implying in her comments.  However, it is not a legal requirement and indeed may not be available, especially where the alleged incidents took place decades earlier.  Incidents of sexual assault normally occur in private."</blockquote>

<p>The McDougall decision is incredibly important for those of us that represent victims of childhood sexual abuse.</p>

<p>Had the B.C. Court of Appeal ruling not been overturned it would have created huge barrier for victims of childhood abuse to receive justice. Childhood sexual abuse is a crime of secrecy. There are rarely any witnesses to childhood sexual abuse and to require independent corroboration from witnesses would, effectively, deny the rights of victims to pursue justice in the civil courts.</p>

<p>You can read more about <a href="http://www.apmlawyers.com/lawyer-attorney-1310556.html">the burden of proof in civil claims </a>on my website www.apmlawyers.com.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2008/10/supreme_court_of_canada_clarifies_burden_of_proof_for_sexual_abuse_victims.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2008/10/supreme_court_of_canada_clarifies_burden_of_proof_for_sexual_abuse_victims.html</guid>
         <category>Child Abuse</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:07:53 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Nora Bernard named to Order of Nova Scotia</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I am pleased to announce that my friend and client, Nora Bernard has been named to the Order of Nova Scotia.</p>

<p><img alt="nora.jpg" src="http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/nora.jpg" width="184" height="224" align="left" style="margin-right:8px;" /></p>

<p>Yesterday the Protocol Office for the province of Nova Scotia released the names of this years recipients of the award. You can <a href="http://www.gov.ns.ca/prot/2008recipients.htm">read the announcement here</a>.</p>

<p>I was proud to have met Nora and honoured to have considered her my friend. Her death was a terrible loss.</p>

<p>You can <a href="http://www.apmlawyers.com/lawyer-attorney-1306422.html">read more about Nora </a>on our website.</p>

<p>Related posts:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2008/06/remembering_nora_bernard.html">Remembering Nora Bernard</a> </p>

<p><a href="http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2008/06/prime_minister_offers_historic_apology_to_residential_school_survivors.html">Prime Minister Offers Historic Apology to Residential School Survivors</a> </p>

<p><a href="http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2008/05/prime_minister_to_apologize_for_indian_residential_school_abuse.html">Prime Minister to Apologize (finally) for Indian Residential School Abuse</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/residential_school_claims/">Related Residential School posts</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2008/09/nora_bernard_named_to_order_of_nova_scotia.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2008/09/nora_bernard_named_to_order_of_nova_scotia.html</guid>
         <category>Residential School Claims</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:04:17 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Perry Dunlop still in Jail: Bishop who Hired Abusive Priests Free</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Perry Dunlop, a former Cornwall Ontario police officer whose investigation launched a huge criminal investigation in the 1990s is still in jail. </p>

<p><strong>Contempt of Court</strong></p>

<p>Dunlop refused to testify before the Cornwall public inquiry and was sentenced to 6 months in jail. Yesterday he was sentenced to another 30 days in jail for a criminal conviction of contempt of court.</p>

<p><strong>Sentence Reduced for "Hardship"</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=766804">The National Post has reported</a> that the judges who sentenced Dunlop said he would normally receive another three months in jail. But the judges reduced his sentence because of the hardship to his family and the fact Dunlop has been in protective custody as a former police officer.</p>

<p><strong>Dunlop Started Sex Abuse Investigation</strong></p>

<p>Dunlop triggered a huge investigation into allegations of sexual abuse by more than a dozen men between 1950 and 1980 after he learned that the Cornwall Catholic Diocese had paid a former alter boy $32,000.00 to drop his sexual abuse complaints against 2 priests. </p>

<p><strong>Bishop Knew About Abusive Priests</strong></p>

<p>While Dunlop sits in jail, Bishop Eugene Larocque, who approved the payments to the alter boy  testified before the inquiry that he knew about allegations of sexual abuse against his priests and he even lobbied to have a priest who had been convicted of sodomizing 2 teenagers brought into his Diocese. </p>

<p>So the police officer who uncovered sexual abuse by priests in Cornwall Diocese sits in jail while the Bishop who was responsible for knowingly hiring sexually abusive priests remains free. </p>

<p>Where is the justice in that?<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2008/09/perry_dunlop_still_in_jail_bishop_who_shielded_abusive_priests_free.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2008/09/perry_dunlop_still_in_jail_bishop_who_shielded_abusive_priests_free.html</guid>
         <category>Clergy Abuse</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 08:55:09 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Antigonish Diocese Priest Sexual Abuse Class Action</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The Cape Breton Post has published an update on Ron Martin's class action against the  Antigonish Diocese. </p>

<p>You can <a href="http://www.capebretonpost.com/index.cfm?sid=161211&sc=145">read the story here</a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2008/08/antigonish_diocese_priest_sexual_abuse_class_action.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sexualabuseclaimsblog.com/2008/08/antigonish_diocese_priest_sexual_abuse_class_action.html</guid>
         <category>Clergy Abuse</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:47:46 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
