Posted On: February 27, 2009

Child Abuse can Permanently Alter Your Genes

Childhood abuse can permanently change the way your genes fight stress, leaving victims of childhood abuse more vulnerable to stressful events throughout their life.

Abuse Alters Gene Function

Researchers at Montreal’s McGill University have published a study which suggests that childhood abuse can have, not only long term psychological effects, but can physically alter the way abuse victim’s genes function.

The study, published in the journal Nature Neuroscience found that childhood abuse alters hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) function, increasing the risk of suicide in survivors of childhood abuse.

Researchers compared the brains of suicide victims who had a history of childhood abuse with those who died from suicide (but no history of childhood abuse) and persons who died from natural death.

Abuse Inhibits Production of Anti-Stress Hormones

The study found that the abuse victims underlying DNA was not changed. However, the HPA genes effect was decreased, causing the brain to produce fewer calming hormones which made it more difficult for abuse victims to deal with subsequent stressful events.

Sexual abuse lawyers, and persons who work with survivors of childhood abuse have known for decades that child abuse is one of the highest risk factors for different types of psychiatric disorders.

However, this research appears to be one of the first indicators that childhood abuse can actually cause physical changes to the body which can have an impact on the survivor’s life which spans decades.

It is still early, but perhaps this research may lead to a cure for some of the lasting effects of childhood abuse.

Watch an interview with Patrick McGowan, head of McGill's research team.

Bookmark and Share

Posted On: February 16, 2009

Catholic Church Liable for Sexual Abuse of Altar Boys: St. John’s, Newfoundland

Last week the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador ruled that the Roman Catholic Church in St. John’s was responsible for the sexual abuse of eight former altar boys by disgraced priest, Reverend James Hickey.

Priest Convicted of Abusing Alter Boys

Hickey was criminally charged ten years ago with sexually abusing the boys while he was a parish priest on the Burin Peninsula. He was convicted and spent five years in prison.

Church Fights Victims for 10 Years

Despite Hickey’s criminal conviction the Roman Catholic Church has fought the victim’s claims for compensation tooth and nail for almost 10 years.

Destroyed Faith in God

Gregory Stack, who represented the abuse survivors, told CBC News that the sexual abuse didn’t just destroy the victims physically or psychologically, the sexual abuse destroyed their faith in God.

“The boys…generally came from the more devout catholic homes. The more devout, the more religious parents that pushed their children to become altar boys, and these were the boys who were victimized by the parish priest.

It is the whole coupling of that- the sense that god has abused them. And that’s what they believed in those small communities. By in large, the parish priest was a god-like figure”

This is just another sad example of how the Catholic Church is prepared to fight to it's last penny rather than acknowledge it's responsibility to the victims of sexual abuse by Catholic priests.

Supreme Court Rules Church Responsible for Sexual Abuse

Six years ago the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the Roman Catholic Church is responsible (vicariously liable) for sexual abuse by it's Priests. In Doe v. Bennett (another priest abuse case from Newfoundland) the court ruled that the Roman Catholic Church was responsible for the sexual abuse perpetrated by it's priests because of the power and authority over parishioners that the Church gave to it's priests.

The Supreme Court of Canada stated that:

“The relationship between the bishop and the priest in the Diocese is not only spiritual but temporal.

First, the Bishop provided Bennett with the opportunity to abuse his power.

Second, Bennett’s wrongful acts were strongly related to the psychological intimacy inherent in his role as priest.

Third, the Bishop conferred an enormous degree of power on Bennett relative to his victims”

The Catholic Church’s refusal to acknowledge its responsibility to Hickey’s victims simply perpetuates the view that the Catholic Church cares more about its reputation than it does about protecting vulnerable and innocent children from sexual abuse.

Related Posts:

Do Myths About Child Abuse Explain The Church Sex Abuse Scandals?

Sexual Abuse: Not Just a Catholic Problem?

Does the Catholic Church Attract Sexual Abusers…or Create Them?

Supreme Court of Canada Clarifies Burden of Proof for Sexual Abuse Victims

Bookmark and Share